Even if we are forced to render such probability calculi then Mr. Schieber’s argument is still false since we could still render a probabilistic knowledge of divine propositions making P3 doubly objectionable. Any probability calculus requires the evidence, hypothesis, propositions, or explanation to be compared to some type of background information. In this case, the background information would consist of the knowledge that God is essentially morally perfect and a maximally perfect being. Thus, any epistemic probability on divine propositions renders a probability of a certainty of 1 that whatever the objective meaning of the proposition is then the proposition is not a lie.