The Bible is treated as an ancient volume of literature
This argument merely uses the New Testament as any other texts of antiquity. Rejecting the Bible simply because it’s in the Bible falls into the historiographical forbidden category. These blanket statements won’t do. I’m merely treating the NT as an ancient volume of literature.
It’s of the utmost importance to make a distinction between affirming biblical inerrancy and inspiration and using the biblical literature as a compilation of documents of antiquity. The debate over biblical inerrancy is an intra-Christian debate. Any arguments against the existence of the God of Christianity from problematic biblical passages requires that inerrancy be a necessary condition for his existence, which is certainly false. The debate over inerrancy and any such problem passages requires further arguments from within the Christian dialogue and careful exegesis.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist? »Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist?
The God of Christianity exists »The God of Christianity exists
The Resurrection of Jesus »The Resurrection of Jesus
The Bible doesn't count as evidence »The Bible doesn't count as evidence
The Bible is treated as an ancient volume of literature
The Resurrection of Jesus »The Resurrection of Jesus
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About