(2) The universe is unlikely if its constituents are un/self-caused
Given the contingent constituents of the universe, the existence of the universe (U) is very, very unlikely under the hypothesis that these constituents are themselves uncaused or self-caused (~Cu): that is, P(U|~Cu & k) ≪ 1.
What we observe in the universe consists of a network of cause and effects. This network of causes must have an infinite regress of other contingent causes, be self-caused, or have a first non-contingent cause. However, a network of contingent causes cannot go on to infinity. In such a series, the intermediate causes have no power of their own but are mere effects of the preceding causes. For instance, think of a train. Boxcar A is pulled by B, but only because B is pulled by C. Even if the boxcars number to infinity the boxcars don’t move unless a locomotive causes them to move.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist? »Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist?
The God of Christianity exists »The God of Christianity exists
The Thomistic Cosmological Argument »The Thomistic Cosmological Argument
(2) The universe is unlikely if its constituents are un/self-caused
To explain the first member of a set, you must leave the set. »To explain the first member of a set, you must leave the set.
You can never get an infinite cause from a finite effect »You can never get an infinite cause from a finite effect
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About