Deeply flawed study
The Seralini study was shot through with methodological flaws and cannot be used as a basis for decision making
The EFSA issued a detailed rebuttal of the Seralinin study
CONTEXT(Help)
-
GM Technology and agriculture »GM Technology and agriculture
▲
We should reject GM technology »We should reject GM technology
▲
GM is untested and potentially dangerous »GM is untested and potentially dangerous
▲
Dangerous for Human Health »Dangerous for Human Health
▲
Animal Studies back up toxicity »Animal Studies back up toxicity
▲
Seralini study on rats »Seralini study on rats
■
Deeply flawed study
●
did not follow the internationally accepted toxicity protocols »did not follow the internationally accepted toxicity protocols
●
Feed and Treatment Formulation issues »Feed and Treatment Formulation issues
●
incomplete, fragmentary and selective presentation of data »incomplete, fragmentary and selective presentation of data
●
Only 10 rats per treatment group for carcinogenicity testing »Only 10 rats per treatment group for carcinogenicity testing
●
strain of rats chosen is known to be prone to development of tumours »strain of rats chosen is known to be prone to development of tumours
●
study design includes only one control group »study design includes only one control group
●
study design includes only one control group »study design includes only one control group
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About