Discuss with David: Could debategraph benefit from input from enactive cognitive science? My understanding is that debategraph's designers intend to create a user experience that is intuitive and stimulates a fluidity in thought, communication and connection. Enaction demonstrates that cognition is created from our embodied active engagement with the environment. How could debategraph be designed to take this into account. Could the user experience of debategraph be one that is cognisant or and consistent with the nature of our cognition and the cognitive structures through which we intuit, become insightful, create, symbolise and communicate meaning? How are/or could these processes be aided by a cognitively sensitive 'user experience' design? How could the user experience of debategraph promote intersubjectivity, cooperation and collaboration?