Why waste money on something ineffective
Building a physical fence along the entire border with Mexico was one of the dumbest ideas I heard when I was commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection. It is critical to recognize that fencing (even with barbed wire, electrification, and possibly a moat filled with alligators) is not a solution, it is only a tool. There's a fundamental misunderstanding about what a physical barrier—even the triple-layer fencing in San Diego--actually does or doesn't do for the agency charged with building fencing and securing the border. All it really does is buy you time where a crosser could otherwise quickly escape or assimilate. None of the fencing is impenetrable. People will eventually dig under it or cut through it or go over it, but it gives you enough time to respond and apprehend them. Some fencing makes sense tactically in areas selected by the Border Patrol, as where we deployed some 700 miles of it under my tenure, and in many of those areas it has been a tool to provide permanent impedance to deter and slow illegal entries on foot or by vehicle.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Argumentation and Debate - 62241 »Argumentation and Debate - 62241
Elia Osorno »Elia Osorno
Debate #4 »Debate #4
The U.S. should secure its southern borders »The U.S. should secure its southern borders
Secure southern borders »Secure southern borders
"Bridge to Nowhere" »"Bridge to Nowhere"
People cross over regardless, tax payers can't afford to pay for fence »People cross over regardless, tax payers can't afford to pay for fence
Why waste money on something ineffective
None of the fencing is impenetrable »None of the fencing is impenetrable
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About