Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Judges may discriminate too well
SupportiveArgument
1
#225
Overly discerning or chauvinistic judges might fail intelligent machines solely because of their machine like behaviour.
Ned Block, 1981.
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence☜A collaboratively editable version of Robert Horns brilliant and pioneering debate map Can Computers Think?—exploring 50 years of philosophical argument about the possibility of computer thought.☜F1CEB7
▲
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] »
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2]
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] ☜Is the Turing Test—proposed by Alan Turing in 1950—an adequate test of thinking? Can it determine whether a machine can think? If a computer passess the test by persuading judges via a teletyped conversation that its human can it be said to think?☜FFB597
▲
No: failing the Test is not decisive »
No: failing the Test is not decisive
No: failing the Test is not decisive☜It is possible to fail the Turing Test for intelligence and still be an intelligent being. ☜59C6EF
■
Judges may discriminate too well
Judges may discriminate too well☜Overly discerning or chauvinistic judges might fail intelligent machines solely because of their machine like behaviour.☜98CE71
►
Human judges are unreliable »
Human judges are unreliable
Human judges are unreliable☜The behavioral disposition argument avoids the problems associated with the operational interpretation, but relies on human judges, who may chauvanistically reject intelligent machines or foolishly pass cleverly designed but unintelligent machines.☜FFFACD
◄
Ned Block »
Ned Block
Ned Block☜Arguments advanced by Ned Block.☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#225
Node type:
SupportiveArgument
Entry date (GMT):
6/13/2006 2:56:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
12/9/2007 8:52:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
1
Outgoing cross-relations:
1
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload
