Spectators attend illegal dog fights because there is no punishment

B. Spectator Issues

i. Laws

Most jurisdictions have statutes that impose criminal liability for being a spectator at a dogfight. See, Chart of Dog-Fighting Laws for specific laws by jurisdiction. The statutes all include a knowledge requirement, such that an individual must intentionally engage in wrongful conduct, and cannot be held criminally liable for accidentally witnessing or unintentionally encountering a dogfighting exhibition. Individuals charged under the criminal spectator statutes often deny any intentional participation in the dogfight. Several investigative techniques may be utilized to refute such claims. Officers should look for evidence linking the defendant to the exhibition, such as entrance fees paid to attend, wagers placed on the dogs, verbal instigation of the fights. Sometimes photographic or video evidence gathered at the scene may include footage of the defendant attending that or other fights as a spectator. [142] In other cases, the intent requirement may be satisfied through circumstantial evidence such as showing that the defendant was present at the fight for a certain amount of time, thereby negating any defense of accidentally encountering the exhibition. [143]

CONTEXT(Help)
-
Argumentation and Debate - 62241 »Argumentation and Debate - 62241
Jackie Arsenault »Jackie Arsenault
House of Reps »House of Reps
The US Gov should punish all parties involved in dog fights »The US Gov should punish all parties involved in dog fights
Spectators attend illegal dog fights because there is no punishment
owners merge into the crowd to escape arrest and charges »owners merge into the crowd to escape arrest and charges
the current law does not disclose spectators consequences »the current law does not disclose spectators consequences
dog fights would still happen so what's the point? »dog fights would still happen so what's the point?
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About