If failed, benefits can't be restored until person undergoes treatment
Drug Free Families Act of 2011, introduced by Republican Senator David Vitter of Louisiana, would take the issue to the federal level by requiring all fifty states to adopt the drug-testing mandate. Proponents of the laws estimate they will save millions and ensure that tax dollars aren’t going to support drug habits. And if drug tests are required for many jobs, they argue, why not for government handouts?
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Argumentation and Debate - 62241 »Argumentation and Debate - 62241
▲
Danielle Gomez »Danielle Gomez
▲
House Of Reps. »House Of Reps.
▲
Implementing drug testing programs. »Implementing drug testing programs.
▲
H.R. 1769: Drug Free Families Act of 2011 »H.R. 1769: Drug Free Families Act of 2011
▲
Monetary assistance from govt should be subjected to pass a drug test »Monetary assistance from govt should be subjected to pass a drug test
■
If failed, benefits can't be restored until person undergoes treatment
●
The country will save millions of dollars.  »The country will save millions of dollars.
●
Welfare money will not go towards supporting drug habits.  »Welfare money will not go towards supporting drug habits.
●
Will help people get their lives back on track with treatment program »Will help people get their lives back on track with treatment program
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About