Use of force in self-defence requires actual or imminent attack
Use of force in self-defence requires an attack which is actual or imminent.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
The Legal Status of the War on Iraq »The Legal Status of the War on Iraq
▲
Is the CWI legal under international law? »Is the CWI legal under international law?
▲
CWI would violate international law »CWI would violate international law
▲
There is no legal right to go war »There is no legal right to go war
▲
Only two legal bases for use of force under international law »Only two legal bases for use of force under international law
▲
Self-defence »Self-defence
▲
Would war on Iraq meet definition of self-defence? »Would war on Iraq meet definition of self-defence?
▲
Coalition War on Iraq would not be self-defence »Coalition War on Iraq would not be self-defence
■
Use of force in self-defence requires actual or imminent attack
●
There is no actual or imminent attack from Iraq »There is no actual or imminent attack from Iraq
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About