Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Red herring fallacies
Issue
1
#130773
Red herring – argument given in response to another argument, which is irrelevant and draws attention away from subject of argument.
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Fallacies »
Fallacies
Fallacies☜A fallacy is incorrect argumentation in logic and rhetoric resulting in a lack of validity, or more generally, a lack of soundness – and, where applicable, you can use Pointer cross-relations from ideas on other maps to indicate that the idea is fallacious (and why). ☜F1CEB7
■
Red herring fallacies
Red herring fallacies☜Red herring – argument given in response to another argument, which is irrelevant and draws attention away from subject of argument.☜FFB597
●
Ad hominem »
Ad hominem
Ad hominem☜Ad hominem – attacking the arguer instead of the argument.☜59C6EF
●
Appeal to authority »
Appeal to authority
Appeal to authority☜Appeal to authority – where an assertion is deemed true because of the position or authority of the person asserting it.☜59C6EF
●
Appeal to consequences »
Appeal to consequences
Appeal to consequences☜Appeal to consequences (argumentum ad consequentiam) – the conclusion is supported by a premise that asserts positive or negative consequences from some course of action in an attempt to distract from the initial discussion.☜59C6EF
●
Appeal to emotion »
Appeal to emotion
Appeal to emotion☜Appeal to emotion – where an argument is made due to the manipulation of emotions, rather than the use of valid reasoning.☜59C6EF
●
Appeal to equality »
Appeal to equality
Appeal to equality☜Appeal to equality – where an assertion is deemed true or false based on an assumed pretense of equality.☜59C6EF
●
Appeal to motive »
Appeal to motive
Appeal to motive☜Appeal to motive – where a premise is dismissed by calling into question the motives of its proposer.☜59C6EF
●
Appeal to novelty »
Appeal to novelty
Appeal to novelty☜Appeal to novelty (argumentum ad novitam) – where a proposal is claimed to be superior or better solely because it is new or modern.☜59C6EF
●
Appeal to poverty »
Appeal to poverty
Appeal to poverty☜Appeal to poverty (argumentum ad Lazarum) – supporting a conclusion because the arguer is poor (or refuting because the arguer is wealthy). (Opposite of appeal to wealth).☜59C6EF
●
Appeal to tradition »
Appeal to tradition
Appeal to tradition☜Appeal to tradition (argumentum ad antiquitam) – a conclusion supported solely because it has long been held to be true.☜59C6EF
●
Appeal to wealth »
Appeal to wealth
Appeal to wealth☜Appeal to wealth (argumentum ad crumenam) – supporting a conclusion because the arguer is wealthy (or refuting because the arguer is poor). (Sometimes taken together with the appeal to poverty as a general appeal to the arguers financial situation.)☜59C6EF
●
Argument from silence »
Argument from silence
Argument from silence☜Argument from silence (argumentum ex silentio) – a conclusion based on silence or lack of contrary evidence.☜59C6EF
●
Argumentum ad baculum »
Argumentum ad baculum
Argumentum ad baculum☜Argumentum ad baculum (appeal to the stick, appeal to force, appeal to threat) – an argument made through coercion or threats of force to support position.☜59C6EF
●
Argumentum ad populum »
Argumentum ad populum
Argumentum ad populum☜Argumentum ad populum (appeal to belief, appeal to the majority, appeal to the people) – where a proposition is claimed to be true or good solely because many people believe it to be so.☜59C6EF
●
Association fallacy »
Association fallacy
Association fallacy☜Association fallacy (guilt by association) – arguing that because two things share a property they are the same.☜59C6EF
●
Chronological snobbery »
Chronological snobbery
Chronological snobbery☜Chronological snobbery – where a thesis is deemed incorrect because it was commonly held when something else, clearly false, was also commonly held.☜59C6EF
●
Genetic fallacy »
Genetic fallacy
Genetic fallacy☜Genetic fallacy – where a conclusion is suggested based solely on something or someones origin rather than its current meaning or context.☜59C6EF
●
Judgmental language »
Judgmental language
Judgmental language☜Judgmental language – insulting or pejorative language to influence the recipients judgment.☜59C6EF
●
Naturalistic fallacy »
Naturalistic fallacy
Naturalistic fallacy☜Naturalistic fallacy (is–ought fallacy) – claims about what ought to be on the basis of statements about what is.☜59C6EF
●
Reductio ad Hitlerum »
Reductio ad Hitlerum
Reductio ad Hitlerum☜Reductio ad Hitlerum (playing the Nazi card) – comparing an opponent or their argument to Hitler or Nazism in an attempt to associate a position with one that is universally reviled.☜59C6EF
●
Straw man »
Straw man
Straw man☜Straw man – an argument based on misrepresentation of an opponents position.☜59C6EF
●
Texas sharpshooter fallacy »
Texas sharpshooter fallacy
Texas sharpshooter fallacy☜Texas sharpshooter fallacy – improperly asserting a cause to explain a cluster of data.☜59C6EF
●
Tu quoque »
Tu quoque
Tu quoque☜Tu quoque (you too, appeal to hypocrisy) – the argument states that a certain position is false or wrong and/or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to act consistently in accordance with that position.☜59C6EF
●
Two wrongs make a right »
Two wrongs make a right
Two wrongs make a right☜Two wrongs make a right – occurs when it is assumed that if one wrong is committed, another wrong will cancel it out.☜59C6EF
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
July 2024
>
<<
July 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
27
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
28
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
29
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
30
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
31
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
32
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#130773
Node type:
Issue
Entry date (GMT):
12/6/2011 8:21:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
12/6/2011 8:21:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
5
by
1
users
x
Select file to upload