Knowledge Federation is 'the transdiscipline for knowledge federation.'

A discipline joins together experts in a certain traditional domain of interest, to increase the knowledge in that domain. A transdiscipline joins together a suitable combination of experts and other stakeholders from a variety of domains of interest, to work on a design task or question of contemporary interest.

Knowledge federation is quite accurately a direct and systemic response to the challenge that Vannevar Bush was pointing at when he wrote As We May Think:

 There is a growing mountain of research. But there is increased evidence that we are being bogged down today as specialization extends. The investigator is staggered by the findings and conclusions of thousands of other workers—conclusions which he cannot find time to grasp, much less to remember, as they appear. Yet specialization becomes increasingly necessary for progress, and the effort to bridge between disciplines is correspondingly superficial.

Professionally our methods of transmitting and reviewing the results of research are generations old and by now are totally inadequate for their purpose. If the aggregate time spent in writing scholarly works and in reading them could be evaluated, the ratio between these amounts of time might well be startling. Those who conscientiously attempt to keep abreast of current thought, even in restricted fields, by close and continuous reading might well shy away from an examination calculated to show how much of the previous month's efforts could be produced on call. Mendel's concept of the laws of genetics was lost to the world for a generation because his publication did not reach the few who were capable of grasping and extending it; and this sort of catastrophe is undoubtedly being repeated all about us, as truly significant attainments become lost in the mass of the inconsequential.

The difficulty seems to be, not so much that we publish unduly in view of the extent and variety of present day interests, but rather that publication has been extended far beyond our present ability to make real use of the record. The summation of human experience is being expanded at a prodigious rate, and the means we use for threading through the consequent maze to the momentarily important item is the same as was used in the days of square-rigged ships.

 
NOTE: You can add new items and sub-sections to your profile map – but to create a standard Debategraph – using the Issue, Position, and Supportive Argument idea types etc – click the New map button.