Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Such rights shouldn't be recognized in law
OpposingArgument
1
#1260
Abortion is inconsistent with foetal legal rights, but it is the foetal legal rights which are wrong and should be changed.
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Abortion »
Abortion
Abortion☜A map exploring the issues arising in the abortion debate.☜F1CEB7
▲
Definition of Person »
Definition of Person
Definition of Person☜Central to the debate about abortion is the question of what defines a person. Often, the point of stasis in this debate involves the moment that a persons life begins and when their rights as such should be recognized by society.☜FFB597
▲
We ought to be consistent »
We ought to be consistent
We ought to be consistent☜☜59C6EF
▲
Abortion is inconsistent with foetal legal rights »
Abortion is inconsistent with foetal legal rights
Abortion is inconsistent with foetal legal rights☜USA law recognizes some foetal rights, e.g. considering a childs mother culpable for taking drugs during pregnancy that will discolur the childs teeth. It is inconsistent to recognise a foetal right to health, but not recognise a foetal right to life.☜9FDEF6
▲
Children likewise 'have rights' before fertilisation »
Children likewise 'have rights' before fertilisation
Children likewise 'have rights' before fertilisation☜Soldiers may sue for being exposed to nuclear tests which resulted in birth defects. This should be so, but does not imply a child existed at that time.☜EF597B
■
Such rights shouldn't be recognized in law
Such rights shouldn't be recognized in law☜Abortion is inconsistent with foetal legal rights, but it is the foetal legal rights which are wrong and should be changed.☜EF597B
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#1260
Node type:
OpposingArgument
Entry date (GMT):
10/2/2006 5:35:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
8/12/2009 2:10:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload