Details view: Spencer’s model is unrealistic, flawed, and incorrect

Views
Add
Edit
- Edit page
- Delete page
Share
Login
- Member login
- Register now for a free account
🔎

Spencer’s model is "unrealistic", "flawed", and "incorrect" OpposingArgument1 #114557

CONTEXT(Help)

Anthropogenic Climate Change »Anthropogenic Climate ChangeAnthropogenic Climate Change☜Mapping the causes, consequences and potential responses to climate change.☜F1CEB7

▲

Is the Earth's climate changing? »Is the Earth's climate changing?Is the Earth's climate changing?☜To what extent and in what ways is the Earths climate changing?☜FFB597

▲

Sensitivity of Earth's climate to atmospheric CO2? »Sensitivity of Earth's climate to atmospheric CO2?Sensitivity of Earth's climate to atmospheric CO2?☜How sensitive is the Earths climate to variations in atmospheric CO2?☜FFB597

▲

Climate isn't highly sensitive to variations in atmospheric CO2 »Climate isn't highly sensitive to variations in atmospheric CO2Climate isn't highly sensitive to variations in atmospheric CO2☜☜59C6EF

▲

New NASA data challenges global warming alarmism »New NASA data challenges global warming alarmismNew NASA data challenges global warming alarmism☜NASA satellite data show the Earth’s atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, according to a study published on July 25, 2011 in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing.☜98CE71

■

Spencer’s model is "unrealistic", "flawed", and "incorrect"Spencer’s model is "unrealistic", "flawed", and "incorrect"☜☜EF597B

Heading

Summary

Click the button to enter task scheduling information

Details

Enter task details

Message text

Select assignee(s)

Due date (click calendar)

RadDatePicker

Open the calendar popup.

Calendar

Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<	<	November 2024	>	<<

November 2024
	S	M	T	W	T	F	S
44	27	28	29	30	31	1	2
45	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
46	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
47	17	18	19	20	21	22	23
48	24	25	26	27	28	29	30
49	1	2	3	4	5	6	7

Reminder

Ready to post Copy to text

Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered

Lock

Comment graphing options

Choose comments:Comment onlyWhole threadAll comments

Choose location:To a new mapTo this map

New map options

Select map ontology Graph to private map

+Comments (0)

- CommentsAdd a commentNewest firstOldest firstShow threads

+Citations (1)

- CitationsAdd new citationList by: CiterankMap

Link[1] No, new data does not “blow a gaping hole in global warming alarmism"

Author: Phil Plait - Bad Astronomy
Cited by: François Dongier 7:54 PM 29 July 2011 GMT
URL:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/29/no-new-data-does-not-blow-a-gaping-hole-in-global-warming-alarmism/

Excerpt / Summary

Stephanie Pappas at LiveScience contacted several climate scientists about Spencer’s paper, and their conclusions were quite harsh. They say Spencer’s model is "unrealistic", "flawed", and "incorrect". As ThinkProgress points out, a geochemist has shown that Spencer’s models are irretrievably flawed, "don’t make any physical sense", and that Spencer has a track record in using such flawed analysis to draw any conclusion he wants.

+About

- About

Entered by:- François Dongier
NodeID: #114557
Node type: OpposingArgument
Entry date (GMT): 7/29/2011 7:48:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT): 7/29/2011 7:48:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations: 0
Outgoing cross-relations: 0
Average rating: 0 by 0 users

x Select file to upload