|
Updated Boltzmann-Schuetz Position1 #113880 There have been some recent attempts to combine the basic Boltzmann-Schuetz idea with modern cosmology - especially theories that envisage a multiverse. This overcomes a key defect of Boltzmann-Schuetz - the fact that our observable universe is not old or large enough to provide the fluctuations. | In the paper cited below Milan Cirkovic argues that the multiverse provides a 'grand stage' in which the required low-entropy initial conditions can be expected to occur in at least some cases. The paper by Aguirre, Carroll et al takes a somewhat different tack by focusing on the occurrence of fluctations in de Sitter space - the state of near vacuum in the distant future, a phenomenon essential to Carroll's account which envisages 'baby universes' arising with conditions suitable for cosmological inflation out of such space. The image below is taken from the article cited below from the CERN Courier. The caption reads: " A self-reproducing universe. This computer-generated simulation shows exponentially large domains, each with different laws of physics (associated with different colours). Peaks are new 'Big Bangs', with heights corresponding to the energy density" (simulations by Andrei and Dimitri Linde). |
+Citations (2) - CitationsAdd new citationList by: CiterankMapLink[1] The Thermodynamic Arrow of Time: Reinterpreting the Boltzmann-Schuetz argument
Author: Cirkovic, Milan M. Cited by: Peter Baldwin 7:47 AM 21 July 2011 GMT URL: | Excerpt / Summary ABSTRACT
The recent surge of interest in the origin of the temporal asymmetry of thermodynamical systems (including the accessible part of the universe itself ) has put forward two possible explanatory approaches to this age-old problem. Hereby we show that there is a third possible alternative, based on the generalization of the classical (‘‘Boltzmann–Schuetz’’) anthropic fluctuation picture of the origin of the perceived entropy gradient. This alternative (which we dub the Acausal-Anthropic approach) is based on accepting Boltzmann’s statistical measure at its face value, and accomodating it within the quantum cosmological concept of the multiverse. We argue that conventional objections raised against the Boltzmann–Schuetz view are less forceful and serious than it is usually assumed. A fortiori, they are incapable of rendering the generalized theory untenable. On the contrary, this analysis highlights some of the other advantages of the multiverse approach to the thermodynamical arrow of time.
EXCERPT
The basic idea of the Acausal-Anthropic approach is that, having already received from (quantum) cosmology a useful notion of the multiverse, we could as well employ it in order to account for the prima facie extremely improbable choice of (local) initial conditions. In other words, we imagine that everything that exists, for which we shall use the term multiverse, represents a ‘‘Grand Stage’’ for the unfolding of—among other things—the thermodynamical histories of chunks of matter. Entropy in the multiverse is high almost everywhere and at all times (‘‘almost’’ here meaning ‘‘everywhere minus a possible subset of small or zero measure’’). In other words, the multiverse is, formally speaking, in the state of ‘‘heat death,’’ as envisaged by classical thermodynamics. Our cosmological domain (‘‘the universe’’) represents a natural fluctuation—presumably of small or zero measure; but the anthropic selection effect answers the question ‘‘why do we find ourselves on an upward slope of such a fluctuation?’’ Hence what needs explaining is not that there are such fluctuations (this is entailed by Boltzmann’s statistical measure); nor the fact that the local initial conditions are of extremely low probability (this results from a distribution over all domains); but the fact that we happen to live in such an atypical region of the ‘‘grand total’’ which is almost always in equilibrium. And that is to be explained by showing why the observed entropy gradient is necessary for our existence as intelligent observers. |
Link[2] Out of equilibrium: understanding cosmological evolution to lower-entropy states
Author: Aguire, Anthony and Carroll, Sean and Johnson, Mathew Cited by: Peter Baldwin 1:07 AM 11 August 2011 GMT Citerank: (2) 115216Invisible because suddenIf the jump to low entropy takes place all at once, rather than in steps, it would not be observed. The usual presumption is that such fluctuations will take this form. The paper cited below disputes this (see sibling node).959C6EF, 115218Observed by Boltzmann brainOne response to the original Boltzmann-Schuetz hypothesis is that the most probable form in which observers could arise from a low-entropy fluctuation would be as a fully formed brain with a minimal environment. If formed gradually, rather than in one step, it would observe declining entropy.959C6EF URL:
| Excerpt / Summary The law of non-decreasing entropy is one of the most fundamental in physics. As Eddington proscribed: "...if your theory is found to be against the Second Law of thermodynamics I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation." Yet in deriving thermodynamics as a limit of statistical mechanics, it becomes clear that the Second Law is not quite inviolable: in an equilibrium system downward excursions in entropy do occur, have been observed in the laboratory, and may indeed be important for the functioning of life at the molecular level . In statistical mechanics, the Fluctuation Theorem quanties the relative probability that an isolated system will evolve upward or downward in entropy . Because an excursion decreasing entropy by ΔS is suppressed by a factor of exp(-ΔS), in macroscopic systems with thousands of particles or more, signicant "miraculous" downward entropy excursions are so rare that they are essentially never important.
...
In some cosmological models, however, equilibrium states that hold for arbitrarily long timescales can exist, and in this context signicant downward entropy excursions would, inevitably, occur. In fact, in models of eternal inflation, these excursions may be crucial. They are involved, for example, as intermediate states in the Coleman-de Luccia or Hawking-Moss mechanisms by which transitions occur between metastable inflationary vacua, and are central to process in which the vacuum energy increases, as in stochastic eternal inflation or via the Lee-Weinberg mechanism. They also describe, in eternal thermal spaces, the spontaneous emergence of structures such as black holes or Boltzmann Brains from empty space. |
|
|