Why are companies unwilling to share info on testing if prod is safe
Concerned that hazard & risk arguments prevent action. Eg keeping on market and designing chew and spit tests to decide if kids were being exposed, rather than saying this material is a known carcinogen, let's not put it in babies dummies until proven safe.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
MATTER Walking with Stakeholders on new technologies »MATTER Walking with Stakeholders on new technologies
▲
METHODOLOGY »METHODOLOGY
▲
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT  »STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
▲
Stakeholders engaged »Stakeholders engaged
▲
NGOs and consumer groups »NGOs and consumer groups
▲
David Santillo, Greenpeace »David Santillo, Greenpeace
▲
Conversation log »Conversation log
▲
Lack of available data on HSE in public domain raises questions »Lack of available data on HSE in public domain raises questions
▲
It is very difficult to get data on such areas even in public interest »It is very difficult to get data on such areas even in public interest
■
Why are companies unwilling to share info on testing if prod is safe
●
Don't disagree with risk-based approach but how precautionary, when? »Don't disagree with risk-based approach but how precautionary, when?
●
If there are uncertainties, should the product be on the market at all »If there are uncertainties, should the product be on the market at all
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About