Details view: For whom?

Views
Add
Edit
- Edit page
- Delete page
Share
Login
- Member login
- Register now for a free account
🔎

For whom? Issue1 #109089

CONTEXT(Help)

MATTER Walking with Stakeholders on new technologies »MATTER Walking with Stakeholders on new technologiesMATTER Walking with Stakeholders on new technologies☜This project is split into three parts:* Exploring what the public expects companies to communicate about their use of new technologies using nanotech as an example.* A new model of public engagement - tools to help companies respond* Stakeholder feedback☜F1CEB7

▲

PAPERS FOR DISCUSSION - PLEASE JOIN THE DEBATE »PAPERS FOR DISCUSSION - PLEASE JOIN THE DEBATEPAPERS FOR DISCUSSION - PLEASE JOIN THE DEBATE☜☜ECE9CA

▲

WHAT DOES THE PUBLIC WANT TO KNOW? »WHAT DOES THE PUBLIC WANT TO KNOW?WHAT DOES THE PUBLIC WANT TO KNOW?☜Here we evaluated the main public dialogue initiatives for emerging technologies in the UK over the last few years and use that to analyse what public wants to know from business.☜FFB597

▲

Literature Reviewed »Literature ReviewedLiterature Reviewed☜Here is the report from this initiative☜59C6EF

▲

Emerging observations »Emerging observationsEmerging observations☜Observations collected from the Lit Review, related to the questions what is fair to share?☜9FDEF6

▲

What the public are interested in »What the public are interested inWhat the public are interested in☜Evidence emerging from previous public engagement process as to the type of things that the public would like to know more about☜9FDEF6

▲

Direct »Direct Direct ☜Related to a particular technology or product☜9FDEF6

▲

Benefits1 »Benefits1Benefits1☜For whom, at what cost, and in what timescale. Is it for the public good or the benefit of a few who can afford to pay☜FFB597

■

For whom?For whom?☜☜FFB597

●

Private gain »Private gainPrivate gain☜People have concerns about who benefits from new technologies – while people generally see nothing intrinsically wrong with business driving nanotechnology, there’s a concern that public investment in science results in the appropriate public value.☜FFB597

●

public benefit »public benefitpublic benefit☜People value potential technologies that empower them to have more control over their own health and their own lives, while potential technologies that reduce their sense of control are viewed with more caution.☜FFB597

Heading

Summary

Click the button to enter task scheduling information

Details

Enter task details

Message text

Select assignee(s)

Due date (click calendar)

RadDatePicker

Open the calendar popup.

Calendar

Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<	<	July 2025	>	<<

July 2025
	S	M	T	W	T	F	S
27	29	30	1	2	3	4	5
28	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
29	13	14	15	16	17	18	19
30	20	21	22	23	24	25	26
31	27	28	29	30	31	1	2
32	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Reminder

Ready to post Copy to text

Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered

Lock

Comment graphing options

Choose comments:Comment onlyWhole threadAll comments

Choose location:To a new mapTo this map

New map options

Select map ontology Graph to private map

+Comments (0)

- CommentsAdd a commentNewest firstOldest firstShow threads

+Citations (0)

- CitationsAdd new citationList by: CiterankMap

+About

- About

Entered by:- Mike King
NodeID: #109089
Node type: Issue
Entry date (GMT): 5/20/2011 1:22:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT): 5/20/2011 1:22:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations: 0
Outgoing cross-relations: 0
Average rating: 0 by 0 users

x Select file to upload