Impenetrability doesn’t isolate basic elements
The requirement that basic elements of functional architecture must be cognitively impenetrable is flawed as many body functions—eg digestion—are cognitively penetrable but still basic, and elements can change levels in the functional hierarchy.
The requirement that basic elements of functional architecture must be cognitively impenetrable is flawed:

  • many functions of the body, such as digestion are cognitively penetrable but still basic to many explanations;
  • the cognitive impenetrability condition assumes a fixed level for elements in the functional architecture. But functional element sometimes change levels in the hierarchy.
Mark Rollins (1989).
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't understand images [5b] »No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Images represented by filled cells in an array »Images represented by filled cells in an array
Images are Quasi-pictorial representations »Images are Quasi-pictorial representations
Image Psychology »Image Psychology
Images are primitive, functional components of thought »Images are primitive, functional components of thought
Images aren't primitive explanatory concepts »Images aren't primitive explanatory concepts
Images are cognitively penetrable »Images are cognitively penetrable
Impenetrability doesn’t isolate basic elements
Stephen Kosslyn »Stephen Kosslyn
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (0)
+About