Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page â
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
đ
Three level distiction is inchoerent
UnterstĂŒtzendes Argument
1
#925
Smolensky's three level distinction is incoherent.
Louise Anthony and Joseph Levine (1988).
Immediately related elements
How this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial IntelligenceâA collaboratively editable version of Robert Horns brilliant and pioneering debate map Can Computers Think?âexploring 50 years of philosophical argument about the possibility of computer thought.âF1CEB7
▲
Can computers think? [1] »
Can computers think? [1]
Can computers think? [1]âCan a computational system possess all important elements of human thinking or understanding? âFFB597
▲
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a] »
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]âConnectionist networks can possess all important elements of human thinking or understanding.â59C6EF
▲
The Subsymbolic Paradigm »
The Subsymbolic Paradigm
The Subsymbolic ParadigmâThe fundamental level of analysis for studying the mind is the subconceptual level, which describes fine-grained subsymbolic activity in a connectionist network. â98CE71
▲
Smolensky's treatment of levels is problematic »
Smolensky's treatment of levels is problematic
Smolensky's treatment of levels is problematicâSmolenskys account of the conceptual, subconceptual, and neural levels (and the relations between them) is problematic.âEF597B
■
Three level distiction is inchoerent
Three level distiction is inchoerentâSmolenskys three level distinction is incoherent.â98CE71
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Kommentare (
0
)
- Kommentare
Kommentar hinzufĂŒgen
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Verweise (
0
)
- Verweise
HinzufĂŒgen
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Eingabe von:
David Price
NodeID:
#925
Node type:
SupportiveArgument
Eingabedatum (GMT):
8/19/2006 4:09:00 PM
Zuletzt geÀndert am (GMT):
8/19/2006 4:09:00 PM
Show other editors
Eingehende Kreuzverbindungen
0
Abgehende Kreuzverbindungen
0
Durchschnittsbewertung
0
by
0
Nutzer
x
Select file to upload