Three-level distinction is too simple
The three levels distinction is too simple. There are more levels and modelling strategies than just three.
Gardner Quarnton (1988).
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence Â»Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] Â»Can computers think? [1]
▲
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a] Â»Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
▲
The Subsymbolic Paradigm Â»The Subsymbolic Paradigm
▲
Smolensky's treatment of levels is problematic Â»Smolensky's treatment of levels is problematic
■
Three-level distinction is too simple
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (0)
+About