pros/cons vs supporters/detracters
One idea I had is to distinguish the following entity types:

- pros/cons - attached directly to options/ideas, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses

- supporters/detracters - a tree of claims attached to a pro or con, representing the debate about whether it is true or not

This makes the ontology bigger, increasing the learning curve, but it does think I distinguish between two logically differing map roles (evaluation vs arguments) and may thus reduce confusion overall.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
ESSENCE 2009 planning issues Â»ESSENCE 2009 planning issues
How well is this tool working for us? Â»How well is this tool working for us?
Expressing chains of Pros/Cons Â»Expressing chains of Pros/Cons
pros/cons vs supporters/detracters
Works well when the opposition is binary Â»Works well when the opposition is binary
Multi-stakeholder, multi-perspective maps complicated Â»Multi-stakeholder, multi-perspective maps complicated
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (0)
+About