| Nuclear industry has spent $665m in US rebranding nuclear energy UnterstĂŒtzendes Argument1 #64243 The nuclear industry spent $665 million in the US on rebranding nuclear energy as clean, green, and an answer to the climate crisis, and on congressional campaigns. |
|
+Verweise (1)
- VerweiseHinzufĂŒgenList by: CiterankMapLink[1]
Zitieren: Diane Perlman
Zitiert von: David Price 11:04 PM 27 May 2010 GMT
Citerank: (9) 64242Nuclear power's positioning on climate change is propaganda13EF597B, 64245GroupthinkThe perceived importance of nuclear power is an example of groupthink.13EF597B, 64247Support for nuclear power undermines non-proliferation and disarmamentThe third pillar of nuclear energy keeps knocking down the other two pillars - nonproliferation and disarmament.13EF597B, 64256Promotion of nuclear power makes elimination of weapons impossible22FF97FF, 128344GroupthinkThe perceived importance of nuclear power is an example of groupthink.13EF597B, 128345Support for nuclear power undermines non-proliferation and disarmamentThe third pillar of nuclear energy keeps knocking down the other two pillars - nonproliferation and disarmament.13EF597B, 128391Promotion of nuclear power makes elimination of weapons impossible22FF97FF, 128476Nuclear power's positioning on climate change is propaganda13EF597B, 128654Nuclear industry has spent $665m in US rebranding nuclear energyThe nuclear industry spent $665 million in the US on rebranding nuclear energy as clean, green, and an answer to the climate crisis, and on congressional campaigns. 1198CE71 URL:
|