|
![]()
| New nuclear weapons states lack historic step-by-step safeguards UnterstĂŒtzendes Argument1 #55145 New nuclear states do not have the benefit of years of step-by-step safeguards put in effect during the Cold War to prevent nuclear accidents, misjudgments or unauthorized launches. | |
+Verweise (1) - VerweiseHinzufĂŒgenList by: CiterankMapLink[1]
Zitieren: George P. Shultz, William J. Perry, Henry A. Kissinger, Sam Nunn
Zitiert von: David Price 7:45 PM 21 March 2010 GMT
Citerank: (7) 55141Doctrine of mutual Soviet-American deterrence is obsoleteThe end of the Cold War made the doctrine of mutual Soviet-American deterrence obsolete.1198CE71, 55143Increased risk that non-state terrorists will acquire nuclear weapons1198CE71, 55144Non-State terrorists aren't amenable to a deterrence strategyThe traditional strategy of deterrenceâi.e. the threat of a nuclear response to a nuclear attackâmay be irrelevant to (or even, in extreme cases, welcomed by) some terrorist groups.8FFB597, 128366Non-State terrorists aren't amenable to a deterrence strategyThe traditional strategy of deterrenceâi.e. the threat of a nuclear response to a nuclear attackâmay be irrelevant to (or even, in extreme cases, welcomed by) some terrorist groups.8FFB597, 128446Increased risk that non-state terrorists will acquire nuclear weapons1198CE71, 128539Doctrine of mutual Soviet-American deterrence is obsoleteThe end of the Cold War made the doctrine of mutual Soviet-American deterrence obsolete.1198CE71, 128837New nuclear weapons states lack historic step-by-step safeguardsNew nuclear states do not have the benefit of years of step-by-step safeguards put in effect during the Cold War to prevent nuclear accidents, misjudgments or unauthorized launches.1198CE71 URL:
| | Auszug - New nuclear states do not have the benefit of years of step-by-step safeguards put in effect during the Cold War to prevent nuclear accidents, misjudgments or unauthorized launches. |
|
|