Heuristic search is inconsistent with human phenomenology
Human experts play chess by "zeroing in" on relevant moves in fringe consiciousness rather than by iterating through a list of possiblities.
Hubert Dreyfus (1996).

Note: Dreyfus uses similar considerations to dispute machine translation, natural language understanding, and pattern recognition, which also require fringe consciousness and zeroing in.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence Â»Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] Â»Can computers think? [1]
▲
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3] Â»Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
▲
The Heuristic Search Assumption Â»The Heuristic Search Assumption
▲
Computers play expert chess using heuristic search Â»Computers play expert chess using heuristic search
■
Heuristic search is inconsistent with human phenomenology
●
Humans see chess board as a Gestalt whole Â»Humans see chess board as a Gestalt whole
●
Humans zero-in on information in fringe consciousness Â»Humans zero-in on information in fringe consciousness
◄
Hubert Dreyfus Â»Hubert Dreyfus
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (0)
+About