Is the bureucratic conception of identity harmful?
Is the bureucratic conception of identity harmful?
Comment by Guy Herbert on the Ideal Government blog in response the debate around the introduction of a proposed new biometric ID system in the UK:

"The debate around introduction of biometric ID systems ought to be about and the universal implementation of a bureaucratic model of the person.

Why the near universal assumption that identity is a property of persons, not relationships of persons?

Why assume that it is/ought to be one-to-one and onto the person?
 
Why assume that persons are/ought to be unitary entities mapped to bodies and containing no inconsistencies of representation or function when viewed in diferent contexts?

Why is making people equivalent for all purposes with a single official file on them even remotely acceptable?"
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Citizens and the State Â»Citizens and the State
Identity and the State Â»Identity and the State
Is the bureucratic conception of identity harmful?
Bureaucratic definition of identity is distorting (to new map) Â»Bureaucratic definition of identity is distorting (to new map)
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (0)
+About