Are we at risk of "changing subject" here?
An idea, itself is a Subject; it is an event *ideated* somewhere. Then, the idea has *aboutness*, which could be either a single subject (parent node is about the concept (subject) labeled "idea".

The parent node asserts a triple {idea, can have, multiple representations}

But, that parent node is a triple, an assertion.  It is asserting that some subject, labeled "idea" exists in a relationship with multiple representations [of it] -- being the same subject.

So, what, really, is the meaning of the assertion unless there is an entailed change of subject with each different representation?

Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Knowledge Federation Webservices Protocol Â»Knowledge Federation Webservices Protocol
Requirements Â»Requirements
An idea can have multiple expressions Â»An idea can have multiple expressions
Are we at risk of "changing subject" here?
Different representations of a Subject don't change the subject. Â»Different representations of a Subject don't change the subject.
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (0)
+About