| The results could be manipulated or gamed for dubious purposes UnterstĂŒtzendes Argument1 #306177 Does this mean crowdsourcing is inherently unsuited to framing a balanced risk assessment? Might it not in fact be that an open debate exposes actors operating for dubious purposes? Expert panels may have just as much potential to be manipulated - their composition might have been decided on political grounds for example. |
|