Cost $600 Billion to go to Mars. Taxes go down, edu. spending up, etc.
In 1989 NASA estimated that a people-to-Mars program would cost $400 billion, which inflates to $600 billion today.
Present systems for getting from Earth's surface to low-Earth orbit are so fantastically expensive that merely launching the 1,000 tons or so of spacecraft and equipment a Mars mission would require could be accomplished only by cutting health-care benefits, education spending or other important programs--or by raising taxes. Absent some remarkable discovery, astronauts, geologists and biologists once on Mars could do little more than analyze rocks and feel awestruck beholding the sky of another world. Yet rocks can be analyzed by automated probes without risk to human life, and at a tiny fraction of the cost of sending people.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,993172,00.html#ixzz2C5GH2TmL

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,993172,00.html#ixzz2C5G1XSaX
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Argumentation and Debate - 62242 »Argumentation and Debate - 62242
James Wallace »James Wallace
Debate #1- NASA »Debate #1- NASA
Resolved: NASA's budget should be significantly increased »Resolved: NASA's budget should be significantly increased
NASA's budget should be increased »NASA's budget should be increased
Inherency »Inherency
Flying to Mars won't solve any of Earth's problems »Flying to Mars won't solve any of Earth's problems
Cost $600 Billion to go to Mars. Taxes go down, edu. spending up, etc.
Why spend on going to Mars when we can improve our planet w/ that $ »Why spend on going to Mars when we can improve our planet w/ that $
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (0)
+About