No: simulated intelligence isn't real intelligence
Just as simulated diamonds are not real diamonds, a machine that simulates intelligence to pass the Turing Test is not really intelligent. In general, a simulated X is not a real X.


Argument anticipated by Jack Copeland, 1993.

"This objection commences with the observation that a simulated X is not an X.  Simulated diamonds are not diamonds.  A simulated X is X-like, but is not the real McCoy.  Now, suppose a computer passes the Turing Test.  How could this possibly show that the computer thinks?  Success in the Test shows only that the computer has given a good simulation of a thinking thing" (Copeland, 1993, p. 46).

Source: Copeland, Jack (1993) Artificial Intelligence: A Philosophical Introduction.  Oxford: Blackwell.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence Â»Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2]  Â»Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
■
No: simulated intelligence isn't real intelligence
●
Simulations are not duplications Â»Simulations are not duplications
●
Some simulations are duplications Â»Some simulations are duplications
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (0)
+About