Conclusion is robust
While maintaining the claimed growth increment from the Romney plan is likely to be slight, the TPC analysis does consider whether growth predicted by Mankiw (a Romney backer) and Weinzeri would rescue the plan. They conclude it makes little difference.
The estimate of a 14.7 percent revenue offset based on the Mankiw/Weinzeri study is markedly different from the claim made in another pro-Romney simulation done using a neo-classical growth model by Entin and McBride - follow the Inconsistency cross-link for see more about this.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Visualizing the Romney Tax Debate »Visualizing the Romney Tax Debate
Romney's plan stated »Romney's plan stated
But does it compute? »But does it compute?
No - it does not compute »No - it does not compute
The TPC case »The TPC case
Growth effect claim »Growth effect claim
Ignores growth potential »Ignores growth potential
The TPC defends »The TPC defends
Conclusion is robust
2. Entin/McBride »2. Entin/McBride
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (2)
+About