Nondecisive tests can be useful
The Turing Test isn't a definitive litmus test for intelligence, and failing isn't decisive, but this doesn't make it a bad test. Many good tests are nondecisive but useful.


Copeland cites fingerprints as an example of a test that is nondecisive (as fingerprint tests can be foiled by gloves) but still useful nonetheless.

Jack Copeland, 1993.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence Â»Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2]  Â»Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
▲
No: failing the Test is not decisive Â»No: failing the Test is not decisive
■
Nondecisive tests can be useful
◄
Jack Copeland Â»Jack Copeland
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (0)
+About