Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page â
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
đ
Minds are mechanical
Einwand
1
#1176
The human mind can be fully explained by mathematical principles. Because the laws of nature are the same everywhere, the same method should be used to study the mind as is used to study bodies.
By providing a "geometric" theory of emotions and the mind, human behaviour can be shown to be mechanical in the same way that physical bodies are.
Benedict Spinoza (1674).
Immediately related elements
How this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial IntelligenceâA collaboratively editable version of Robert Horns brilliant and pioneering debate map Can Computers Think?âexploring 50 years of philosophical argument about the possibility of computer thought.âF1CEB7
▲
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7] »
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]âIs it mathematically possible for a computer to think as well as a human can? Does the mathematics of computation contain anything to prohibit machines from thinking?âFFB597
▲
Yes: Automata can think »
Yes: Automata can think
Yes: Automata can thinkâA finite automation, like a Turing machine, can replicate all essential aspects of human intelligence. Finite automata are completely mathematically possible. Thus, machine thinking is mathematically possible.â59C6EF
▲
Natural phenomena best understood via mechanism »
Natural phenomena best understood via mechanism
Natural phenomena best understood via mechanismâThe human mind like all natural systems is mechanical. Mechanical explanationsâlike those employed in physicsâprovide the only necessary foundation to the rest of the sciences, including psychology.â98CE71
▲
Mechanistic principles can't explain the mind »
Mechanistic principles can't explain the mind
Mechanistic principles can't explain the mindâThe sould and mind are not made of the same kind of substance as external bodies are, and mechanism cant explain their workings.âEF597B
■
Minds are mechanical
Minds are mechanicalâThe human mind can be fully explained by mathematical principles. Because the laws of nature are the same everywhere, the same method should be used to study the mind as is used to study bodies.âEF597B
●
Mechanism can't support critical philosophy »
Mechanism can't support critical philosophy
Mechanism can't support critical philosophyâThe mechanistic philosophy is inadequate to support critical philosophy because mechanistic explanations tend to ignore the assumption of a purposive designer.âEF597B
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Kommentare (
0
)
- Kommentare
Kommentar hinzufĂŒgen
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Verweise (
0
)
- Verweise
HinzufĂŒgen
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Eingabe von:
David Price
NodeID:
#1176
Node type:
OpposingArgument
Eingabedatum (GMT):
9/1/2006 8:48:00 PM
Zuletzt geÀndert am (GMT):
9/1/2006 8:48:00 PM
Show other editors
Eingehende Kreuzverbindungen
0
Abgehende Kreuzverbindungen
0
Durchschnittsbewertung
0
by
0
Nutzer
x
Select file to upload