Belief in one's own consistency leads to inconsistency
Hutton argues that as humans may be inconsistent, we can’t be sure that the Gödel’s theorem can be applied to minds (see detailed text).
1) Probabililstic evidence suggests we have some contradictory beliefs.

2) Rationality demands we take probabilistic evidence seriously.

3) So, rationality demands we think there's some probability we're inconsistent.

4) So, being certain about one's own consistency—as Lucas claims we can be—is inconsistent with rationality.

Anthony Hutton (1976).
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7] »Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
▲
No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems »No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems
▲
The problem of consistency »The problem of consistency
■
Belief in one's own consistency leads to inconsistency
●
There are overriding reasons to regard minds as consistent »There are overriding reasons to regard minds as consistent
+Kommentare (0)
+Verweise (0)
+About