Propositional codes aren't required

A 3rd propositional code required to translate between visual and verbal code would require a 4th code to translate from verbal to propositional code, and a 5th to translate verbal code to the new intermediary code—leading to an infintite regress.

John Anderson, 1978.



RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Images are secondary to propositions
Dual code theory explains knowledge adequately
Dual codes are too indeterminate
Propositional codes aren't required
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip