Alleged problems have been disconfirmed

Task demands and experimenter effects do not refute scanning and rotation experiments (see detailed text).

Task demands and experimenter effects do not refute scanning and rotation experiments:

  • The claim that task demands caused subjects simulate how they would behave with real objects is disconfirmed by experiments that make no mention of physical motion. References to "physical motion" and "scanning" are replaced by phrases such as "glance up" and "shift attention".
  • The claim that subjects give answers they think the experimenters want to hear is disconfirmed by the fact that subjects often give responses that the experimenters didn’t anticipate. These responses could not have been suggested by the experimenters.
Stephen Kosslyn, Stephen Pinker, George E. Smith, and Steven P. Schwartz (1979).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Images represented by filled cells in an array
Images are Quasi-pictorial representations
Image Psychology
Experimental evidence
Behavioural evidence
Scanning and rotation evidence is problematic
Alleged problems have been disconfirmed
Stephen Kosslyn
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip