Images important even if not primitive explanations

It may be true that images are not primitive, low-level entities. However, explanation does not always require an understanding of what happens at the lowest possible level. The proper level of analysis perception requires the inclusion of images.

For example, you wouldn’t learn much about architectural design just by studying bricks, mortar, steel etc.

Stephen Kosslyn and James Pomerantz (1977).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Images represented by filled cells in an array
Images are Quasi-pictorial representations
Image Psychology
Images are primitive, functional components of thought
Images aren't primitive explanatory concepts
Images important even if not primitive explanations
Stephen Kosslyn
Images are cognitively penetrable
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip