Impenetrability doesn't argue against image theory

The cognitive impenetrability condition doesn't refute image theory because the image theory doesn't assume that all image processes are cognitively impenetrable.

The image theory acknowledges that some image processes are cognitively penetrable, whereas others are not.

The theory also recognises that determining which are which is an important research issue.

Stephen Kosslyn, Stephen Pinker, George E. Smith, and Steven P. Schwartz (1979).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Images represented by filled cells in an array
Images are Quasi-pictorial representations
Image Psychology
Images are primitive, functional components of thought
Images aren't primitive explanatory concepts
Images are cognitively penetrable
Impenetrability doesn't argue against image theory
Impenetrability doesn’t isolate basic elements
Penetrability doesn't affect format
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip