Computers only exhibit the free will of programmers

Computers can't have free will because they can't act except as they are determined by their designers and programmers—i.e. they only exhibit the free will of their programmers.

17

The argument

This view has been held by many since the conception of computing machines; here is an example from Ada Augusta, Countess of Lovelace:

"The Analytical Engine has no pretensions whatever to originate anything. It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform. It can follow analysis; but it has no power of anticipating any analytical relations or truths. Its province is to assist us in making available what we are already acquainted with" (Lady Lovelace, 1842, p. 284).

References

Ada Augusta, Countess Lovelace. 1842. Notes upon the memoir [to 'Sketch of the Analytical Engine In vented by Charles Babbage by L. F. Menabrea'] by the translator. In Charles Babbage and his Calculating Engines, (ed. Emily and Philip Morrison), Dover Publications: New York, 1961.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't have free will
Computers only exhibit the free will of programmers
Preprogrammed robots have no psychological states
Some computers can program themselves
Computers can't do otherwise
Computers don't choose their own rules
Free will has infititude beyond deterministic limits
A determined machine can still have free will
Free will derives from multi-level structure
Free will is a decision-making process
Humans also lack free will
Random selection produces free will
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip