Images aren't primitive explanatory concepts

To be explanatory, images must play a role in causal explanations. Experience suggests they do not. Images in themselves (prior to interpretation) are epiphenomena that ride above a causal substrate of propositions, like foam rides atop a wave.

Zenon Pylyshyn (1973).

Note: Pylyshyn argues elsewhere that, in general, conscious processes lack explanatory power.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Images represented by filled cells in an array
Images are Quasi-pictorial representations
Image Psychology
Images are primitive, functional components of thought
Images aren't primitive explanatory concepts
Images are cognitively penetrable
Images important even if not primitive explanations
Zenon Pylyshyn
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip