Images are primitive, functional components of thought

Thought can’t be explained simply in terms of verbal stimulus-and-response patterns. The phenomena of meaning, memory, learning and language involve a coordination of images with words that is not fully explained by the behaviourist program.

Allan Paivio (1971).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Images represented by filled cells in an array
Images are Quasi-pictorial representations
Image Psychology
Images are primitive, functional components of thought
Images aren't primitive explanatory concepts
Experimental evidence
The definition of image is too vague
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip