Tye's imagery can accommodate connectionist memory

The theory doesn't require that images be stored representationally. The discrete parcels of information contained in images may be stored in a connectionist dispositional system.

Michael Tye, 1991.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Images represented by filled cells in an array
Images are interpreted symbol-filled arrays
Connectionist objection to Tye's theory
Tye's imagery can accommodate connectionist memory
Connectionism doesn't accommodate all evidence
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip