Connectionist objection to Tye's theory

Theory's flawed by its classical conception of memory as storage. Memory isn't stored in a classical representational manner, but is reactivated in a connectionist dispositional fashion, based on the strength of connections between processing nodes.

Argument anticipated by Michael Tye, 1991.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Images represented by filled cells in an array
Images are interpreted symbol-filled arrays
Connectionist objection to Tye's theory
Connectionism doesn't accommodate all evidence
Tye's imagery can accommodate connectionist memory
Visual perception uses 2.5 dimensional arrays
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip