Symbolic processing in specially crafted networks

Modelling symbolic activity requires connectionist architectures that are "handcrafted to produce symbolic-like processing". Symbolic processes don’t emerge from connectionist networks, as Smolensky claims, they must be explicitly built-in.

In future, connectionism will have to move beyond simple feedforward networks to accommodate richer brain and spine architectures.

Connectionism, as part of a "team of concepts and tools", should ultimately model such phenomena as single-trial learning, attention, multispeed learning rates, and working memory.

Walter Schneider, 1988, p.51.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
The Subsymbolic Paradigm
Symbolic processing in specially crafted networks
Common sense and connectionism
The sensorimotor system
Between-module structures
Connectionist networks can’t elaborate capacities quickly
Smolensky's treatment of levels is problematic
Statistical rationality needed
Too much representation, not enough dynamics
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip