Helplessness Argument

When agents (human or machine) make choices at random, they lack free will because the choices are then beyond their control.

The Shaffer Argument

Shaffer asks:
 
"'What causes the wants and beliefs that constitute reasons?'"

He then cites the following possibility:

"...the wants and beliefs themselves have no causes, arising spontaneously and randomly...But...if...the wants and beliefs arise spontaneously and randomly (which is what it is to say they have no causes), then the agent is at the helpless mercy of these interruptions within him which control his behavior..." (J. Shaffer, 1968, p. 106).

"Since beliefs and wants cause our decisions and actions, it would seem that we do not seem to have control over our decisions and actions. Given our beliefs and wants, we must decide and act in a particular way and can do no other. And how could such decisions and actions be free?" (J. Shaffer, 1968, p. 108).

References

Shaffer, J. A. 1968. Philosophy of Mind. Prentice-Hall

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't have free will
Random selection produces free will
Helplessness Argument
Turing's randomizer is only a tiebreaker
Nil preference situations
Randomization eliminates free will
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip