This denunciation of cyber-utopianism is a typical straw man argument

Jay Rosen:

The best example I have found ran in TechCrunch: People, Not Things, Are The Tools Of Revolution by Devin Coldewey. It has everything that makes the form go.

* First, it objects to statements by nameless fools. These statements are not quoted. (“Some are using that moment to praise the social media tools used by some of the protesters, and the role the internet played in fueling the revolution.”)

* It refuses to link to the claims it is criticizing so we can see for ourselves what the claim and its context were. (Coldeway provides exactly one link, to the Gladwell post I just mentioned.)

* It posits that out there somewhere are masses of loud and deluded people–cyber-utopians, they are sometimes called–who think it is as simple as “Twitter topples dictators,” or “add Internet and you get revolution.”

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Technology: Oppressor or liberator?
ICT's capacity to spread democracy?
Cyber-utopianism
Cyber-utopians overstate the revolutionary potential of the Internet
This denunciation of cyber-utopianism is a typical straw man argument
Social media create "weak ties", insufficient for high risk activism
Social media do not help revolutions to happen or succeed
Technology gurus engage in quasi-religious discourse about Internet
The Internet for democracy hype is made of naive cliches
Web campaigns disengage youth from protests
The internet has become the "world's town square"
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip