Anthony misrepresents the argument

Fodor and Pylyshyn don't argue for a classical architecture solely on the basis of systematicity. They acknowledge that a theory of cognition must account for other phenomena as well.

In fact, they discuss productivity and inferential coherence as additional phenomena that a theory of cognition must explain.

Brian McLoughlin,1993a.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
The Connectionist Dilemma
Systematicity not enough to argue for classicism
Anthony misrepresents the argument
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip