No semantics at the connectionist level

And the relevant level of analysis (the cognitive and compositional level), connectionist implementations of classical models are classical, not connectionist. At the implementational(connectionist) level, they have no compositional semantics.

So Chlamers is wrong to claim that connectionist implementations of classical models possess compositional semantics, because, to the extent that they are connectionist implementations, they have no semantics at all.

Keith Butler, 1993a.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
The Connectionist Dilemma
Connectionist machines possess compositional semantics
No semantics at the connectionist level
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip