comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
Clarify the use of argument groups
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
DebateGraph Community
DebateGraph Community☜DebateGraph is evolving rapidly, with new updates on a continuous basis – and a growing community of enthusiastic DebateGraphers around the world. We would love you to connect here with each other – as well as with us – and to share: news about your projects and results; ideas about ways to grow our community; potential topics to map; suggestions for new features and enhancements; and anything else that springs to mind!☜F1CEB7
⌃
Development Ideas
Development Ideas☜What new features and improvements to existing features would you like to see?☜FFB597
⌃
Improving existing features?
Improving existing features?☜What improvements would you like to see to the existing features and functions? What things could be made simpler / clearer? Let us know what you think (either by adding a comment here, or by adding a suggestion as a Position element below).☜FFB597
⌃
Idea types and relationships?
Idea types and relationships?☜Different types of maps within Debategraph use different sets of idea- and relationship- types – and its straightforward to introduce new sets and/or expand the existing sets. What changes and additions would you like to see?☜FFB597
■
Clarify the use of argument groups
Clarify the use of argument groups☜☜59C6EF
↳
Improve the current definition
Improve the current definition☜We probably should be able to provide a clearer definition than this: A set of thematically-related arguments about which opinions differ as to whether, on balance, they support or oppose the matter at hand. ☜9FDEF6
↳
Provide good examples
Provide good examples☜☜9FDEF6
□
"Decision" node type needs a sub-component type (like "positions")
"Decision" node type needs a sub-component type (like "positions")☜A decision may have many aspects which in some cases would be better explained using sub-components much like positions are sometimes explainied using the component node type. Each component may have its own list of tasks.☜59C6EF
□
Argument structuring could be improved
Argument structuring could be improved☜ARGUNET seems to offer a more detailed reconstruction of arguments.☜59C6EF
□
Moves may create type inconsistencies
Moves may create type inconsistencies☜Example: move a position A as a supportive argument to another position B. Through this move, the components of A become components of an argument. And arguments normally do not have components. Probably some type-checking of the children nodes should be done when a node is moved and retyped.☜59C6EF
□
Part arguments were a useful measure against cluttered views
Part arguments were a useful measure against cluttered views☜☜59C6EF
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
July 2024
>
<<
July 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
27
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
28
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
29
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
30
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
31
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
32
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
François Dongier
NodeID:
#90795
Node type:
Position
Entry date (GMT):
2/1/2011 9:31:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
2/1/2011 9:31:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload