comments

Idea types and relationships?

Different types of maps within Debategraph use different sets of idea- and relationship- types – and it's straightforward to introduce new sets and/or expand the existing sets. What changes and additions would you like to see?

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
⌅
DebateGraph Community
⌃
Development Ideas
⌃
Improving existing features?
■
Idea types and relationships?
↳
"Decision" node type needs a sub-component type (like "positions")
↳
Argument structuring could be improved
↳
Clarify the use of argument groups
↳
Moves may create type inconsistencies
↳
Part arguments were a useful measure against cluttered views
□
Stream
□
User experience improvement
□
Feedback Tab
□
Change default font to Verdana?
□
Account page
□
Adding new ideas
□
Browser Tab labels
□
Change the logo?
□
Citations
□
Comment system?
□
Community tab
□
Co-presence and Hailing?
□
Cross-links
□
Deletion
□
Details
□
Different view types?
□
Edit history
□
Email alerts
□
Friendly URLs
□
Highlight new field when moving
□
Home Page
□
Invitation to maps by subject matter
□
Invitations / Messages
□
Map Access
□
Map Meetings
□
Meetings
□
Moving
□
New map creation
□
Outline tab
□
Posters
□
Rating
□
Registration
□
Related maps
□
Search
□
Sharing?
□
Visualizations
□
Ability to move the debatemap screen & encroach on the details screen
□
Keep logged in from last use
□
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip