The West clearly tends to support dictators more than democracy

Despite the popular/propagandist notion, widely spread over the Western population, that the West wants to defend democracy, many Arabs feel that the West is really after the "stability" provided by strong regimes, which facilitates access to the wealth these regimes control.


"One cannot take seriously the United States or any other Western government that funds political activism by young Arabs while it simultaneously provides funds and guns that help cement the power of the very same Arab governments the young social and political activists target for change."
Rami G. Khouri, The New York Times


The following video gives Noam Chomsky's analysis of the Tunisian events:

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Technology: Oppressor or liberator?
U.S. policy on Internet Freedom
Some inconsistencies remain in the U.S. Internet Freedom policy
Internet freedom conflicts with realpolitik foundations of U.S. policy
The West clearly tends to support dictators more than democracy
Does the need for "stability" justify tolerating dictatorships?
Should dictators be supported as a bastion against radical islamism?
Realpolitik prizes stability over liberty
US-France support for Ben Ali et al shows democracy not top priority
West prefers democracies, but can't initiate revolutions everywhere
US support to international activism is perceived as hypocritical
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (1)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip